قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / A judge accuses the SSD of making false statements in a New York travel case

A judge accuses the SSD of making false statements in a New York travel case







Ticket agents wear protective masks during a coronavirus pandemic, and on July 15th.  Helps travelers at LaGuardia airport.  |  AP photo

Photo by Franco Franklin II / AP

A New York federal judge has reprimanded the Department of Homeland Security for statements he found false to ban the New York State from participating in travel programs.

Earlier this year, the Trump administration removed New York from Global Entry and other expedited border crossing programs under state law allowing undocumented immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses.

Advertisement

But last week, central banks fell behind and allowed New York to return to the program. SSD officials admitted in court documents false statements seeking the lifting of a ban that New York had filed for an action for annulment.

U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman called the confessions “very disturbing revelations” on Wednesday.

The short administration said New York, unlike any other state, imposed restrictions on immigration authorities ’access to Department of Motor Vehicles records. In fact, they later acknowledged several other states applied the same restrictions, but had never faced attempts to prevent their travel programs.

Furman noted that the court “has the power to conduct an independent investigation to determine whether he was a victim of fraud.”

He said the divisions of the SSD and the Department of Justice last week “as they suggest” do not “correct the record” at all, as there are clearly only a few examples of inaccurate and misleading statements and not even an exhaustive list. . “

The judge demanded that the federal government provide “a full record of all” inaccurate “or” misleading “statements by August 12.

The report must describe in detail any inaccurate allegations, indicate who made the statement and who was responsible for its content, summarize what was done due to due diligence by government lawyers to verify the accuracy of the statements before submitting them to the court, and explain how officials learned about false data.

“The person or persons responsible for the content of the report should be prepared to testify about how it was drafted should the court decide it was appropriate,” Furman wrote.

Josh Gerstein contributed to this report.


Source link