قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ US https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Verification of facts: Trump claims that the Mueller study is "illegal", ignoring several court decisions

Verification of facts: Trump claims that the Mueller study is "illegal", ignoring several court decisions



The brief reiterated the same argument on Friday tweeting that the study "was an illegal and controversial investigation into a crime". 2018 June Short said "The appointment of a special adviser is totally incompatible!"

Facts First: That's wrong ̵

1; many court rulings have confirmed Mueller's appointment, his authority and the decisions he made.

Several of the accused and witnesses in the survey unsuccessfully attempted to abolish Mueller's mandate. Four Judges of the Judges and two Chambers of Appeal

were appointed to serve as a barrier to this legal challenge

Judges who took these decisions were appointed to a federal stand for Democratic and Republican presidents. Here are some breakdowns of their decisions:

-The former campaign president Paul Manafort said that Mueller's study was constitutional. Manafort said that Deputy Prosecutor General Rosenstein did not give Mueller the authority to bring him financial charges because they were not involved in his work as Chairman of the Campaign for Short.

Federal Judge T.S. Ellis rejected these efforts, even publicly criticizing Mueller's view of Manafort, saying that "no interpretive gymnastics are necessary to determine whether the study in question falls within the scope of Mueller's investigation.

– In a separate criminal case against him, Manafor and his lawyers put forward the same argument. The Mueller study was beyond its legal jurisdiction, because the initial order was too broad, they said.

The federal judge, Amy Berman Jackson, rejected this argument by saying that the Mueller study dealt with the relationship between Manafort and Ukraine and Russia during his investigation in Russia and the Trump campaign. In his opinion, Jackson wrote: "A special adviser would not have liked to ignore such a obvious link between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government."
-Concord Management and Consulting, Russian company Mueller team says that 2016 During the campaign, a "troll farm", which launched political propaganda on the Internet, was accused last year of accusing the US government of interfering in the Federal Electoral Commission. Department of Justice and State Department. The company said it was not to blame.
Federal Judge Dabney Friedrich of the US District Court, shared the Mueller team and rejected Concord's argument that Mueller's investigation was constitutional. "Appointment does not violate the basic principles of separation of powers", August last year. "The Special Advocate also did not exceed his powers in the appointment and prosecution of Concord. Judge Fredrich was appointed Trump.

Beryl Howell, Chief Justice of DC County Court, is also two witnesses – Roger Stone associate and foreign government secret company – disrespect to court because he refused to adhere to the Grand Jury

The DC County Court of Appeal considered Mueller's constitutionality issue after the stone associate Andrew Miller appealed. The panel of three judges unanimously agreed that, under the Constitution, Mueller was lawfully appointed as a prosecutor in the Department of Justice. Miller did not specify whether he would continue to fight.

In a separate group of judges of the same appellate court heard the arguments of a foreign company that was not found in the court's statements. The company argues that it should not follow a criminal investigation or that $ 50,000 a day denies fines because it is protected as part of a foreign sovereign organization, but three judges unanimously disagreed. The Supreme Court intends to review the issue of the company on Friday and has not yet said whether there are high court arguments.

Katelyn Polantz contributed to this report.


Source link